Skip to main content

WTF! The Impact of Profanity in Communications

     You turn on the TV and on your favorite series there's a scene with an actor saying:  "G--d--mit, man have you lost your mind?"  You get in the car with your kids, and a song is playing that references "video h-s" in the lyrics.  You walk into the office, and your co-worker is staring at his computer screen when suddenly he blurts out:  "What the f--k!"  Everywhere you go, you hear it.  We all do.  We all do it.  Whether it's mild profanity or straight up vulgarity, most of America seems to have no qualms about spewing out a few words that would make their mothers blush--unless she's using those very words herself.
     What's the impact of profanity on our communications?  The answer is as wide as the range of profane words that we choose to express ourselves.  They can have no impact at all or they can immensely offend someone.  It depends on the individual, the place, and the circumstance.  If you're amongst friends in a social setting, and you drop a few F-bombs while telling an outrageous story, it may have no impact.  Especially if they use those words as well.  For some people like me, even if I don't use foul language, I don't care.  However, there are others who travel in circles where they rarely hear profanity, and it may stick them like a pin when they finally do.  They are immediately turned off, and they begin to view you differently.  Or if you're at work in a meeting, and a disagreement ensues that results in a nasty verbal exchange peppered with curse words and threats, witnesses to this argument may find both parties unprofessional and lacking self control.  Interestingly enough, as common as coarse language is, few people will address it.  Maybe because it's become so acceptable in our society, we choose to ignore it.  Or we accept people's right to free speech.  But that doesn't necessarily mean people approve. 
     One reason we may be reticent to make complaints about cursing is because all of us do it at some point.  It might not be a part of our regular conversation, but when we become reactionary to some offense, we might let an expletive loose.  Think about it:  the person who cut you off on the interstate, an irritating boss who embarrasses you at work, the discovery of a betrayal by one that is close to you.  Any of those situations might send you shouting, "A-hole!"  I don't advocate foul language, but I can understand your reaction.  In that circumstance, it is just that--a reaction.  But in every day conversation, do we really have to talk BS about SOBs who p-ss us off with their f---ed up choices?  The challenge becomes in how we exchange that interaction for something less egregious because there's nothing more it could actually become except offensive.
     At last count, I read that the English dictionary has over a million words in it.  Surely with that many options, we can find a better way to express ourselves.  Too often in our conversations, we opt for the same eight or ten profane words to say how we feel.  But anything we can say with curse words, I believe we can say without.  Probably even better if we choose to expand our vocabularies.
     The long and short of it boils down to respect.  First, do you respect yourself enough to clean up your language?  Others will judge you based on what you say.  At work, it detracts from your professionalism.  Outside of work, it detracts from your dignity and intelligence.  Secondly, do you respect others enough to clean up your language?  Consider people who just don't want to hear filthy language.  Must they be subject to yours?  Moreover, consider children and young people, older and elder people, group settings and those who you don't hear using profanity.  Think it through and choose a better way to express yourself.  It is a matter of self control and self respect.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What It Means to Speak Truth to Power

     "Speaking truth to power" has become a common phrase to use when speaking about truth and/or power in a discussion that encourages courageous discourse on controversial matters.  It is an old phrase coined back in the 1950s by the Quakers and is defined as "a non-violent political tactic, employed by dissidents against the received wisdom or propaganda of governments they regard as oppressive, authoritarian or an ideocracy." (Wikipedia)      I've heard it overused in a lot of ways and not with a clear purpose in its meaning within the context of what was being spoken.  We latch onto certain words and phrases as language goes in and out of style on almost a monthly basis.  In this current generation, there seems to be a new word or phrase created daily and then abandoned when they become overused like worn out sneakers from last year's fall collection.  But words have staying power even if you get tired of hearing the...

How to Stop Interruptions in Conversations

     So you're sitting in a meeting, and you begin to answer a question that has been directed toward you by your boss.  You get through about half of your response when a colleague jumps in and offers his take and essentially silences you.  There is evidence that if you are a woman, this will happen to you more often than if you are a man, and it's likely to happen to you by both genders.      Interruptions in communications like this happen all the time whether you're in a group offering your opinion or one-on-one sharing a story.  Regardless of the setting, we all find it annoying and rude.  These disruptions of dialogue hamper thought processes, contribute to misunderstandings, and devalue people's input.  So what do we do when they keep happening to us?  A few worthy suggestions can be found in Kathryn Vasel's article,  "Next time someone interrupts you in a meeting, try this" .      But what...

A Dozen Ways to Tell Your Boss No

     In basically every training class I do on communications, I get people who are reluctant to manage up.  In a few cases, the direct, decisive communicators establish early on in the relationship their boundaries and preferences to their boss.  Those bosses who can respect other people's limits tend to listen without feeling threatened or disrespected.  But generally, workers tend to treat their superiors as demigods and themselves as powerless servants who shouldn't speak up for fear that they'd be punished for having an opinion or for pushing back in areas where they are overwhelmed or uncomfortable.  I get asked, "What do I do when my manager piles all of this work on me, and I can't get it done by his unreasonable deadlines?"  Among other things like how they manage their time, I usually ask if they've had a discussion with their manager about their workload.  The common response:  "Oh noooo, I can't do that.  He's the b...