Skip to main content

Why Monopolizing a Conversation is a Show of Arrogance

     You've likely been in a conversation or at least overheard a conversation where one person talked and talked and talked or continuously interjected their opinion at every breath taken by the other side.  You've probably been in a training class and heard one particular participant constantly have something to say every time the facilitator asked a question or tried to move on with a point in the training.  You found it annoying and no doubt so did the other people around you.  Yet, the individual seems clueless that they are monopolizing the discussion.  Everybody in the room wants to say, "Just shut up already!"
     Facilitators like myself have to work harder in these instances to maintain control of the room.  We know that the other participants are looking to us to keep order so that they can get something out of the precious time they're spending in a training class--sometimes classes they've paid for themselves.  Out of politeness, most people--whether a trainer or just the person who's on the other side of the conversation with a monopolizer--feel like they have to use tricks to quiet the person or to overcome their assertiveness.  This takes a lot of mental energy while still trying to concentrate on what we're teaching.  Therefore, it becomes frustrating.  But rather than have us go through psychological manipulation to protect the monopolizer's feelings, the monopolizer needs to understand this one thing:  your domination of any verbal exchange is a display of arrogance.  Yes, arrogance.  That might seem harsh, but here's what I mean.
     A person who constantly offers their opinion unsolicited is acting as if they have all the answers.  They are the proverbial "know-it-all".  If this could be you, listen up.  Any time you feel you should assert your views when no one has asked you, then you are acting like everyone else wants to hear what you have to say.  You believe that your views are important above everyone else's.  In fact, you show it when you hardly give anyone else a chance to speak.  And even if they do get a word in edgewise, you may counter what they say just so your opinion is heard even louder (not necessarily in volume but in value).  You have to prove your point or share your experience or highlight your perspective.  If you're in a training class where the facilitator may throw a question out to the audience, you are usually the one who has to say something even if other people have already contributed.  Even the content of your contributions are all about you and your beliefs. They are usually self-serving and self-centered.
     Arrogance in this instance says "Look at me.  I have an opinion on that and that and that, and I'm going to tell you about it.  I'm going to tell you about me.  I'm going to tell you about what I believe.  I'm going to tell about how your statement applies to me.  I'm going to tell you about my experience with what you just shared.  I'm going to tell you, I'm going to tell, I'm going to tell."
     So here's some advice:  (Yes it's unsolicited, but it's not about me, it's about you.)  Try humility.  Stop for a minute and consider that you don't have all the answers. And even if you believe you do, no one else cares.  When they ask you directly for your opinion, then offer it.  If it is in an open forum, then refrain from offering too much.  Consider the other people in the room and that they have something to contribute as well.  Give them an opportunity to share.  You may be surprised to find that other people are wise and intelligent too, and you may actually learn something if you just take the focus off of you and listen for a change.  Pass it along.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Talk About Race: A Panel Discussion

How to Listen Without Judgment

       Choosing to listen while in a conversation is not a passive effort.  Making the choice is an action that is thoughtful and vital to the life of that communication.  To listen well requires concentration.  It requires tuning in and removing distractions that compete for the listener's attention.  As much as we know this, it is difficult to do.  Many of the distractions that cause us to tune in and out several times in a given conversation come from within our own minds.  We have this constant murmur of chatter going on underneath the discussion in which we're engaged.  While someone is speaking, we're responding to their comments silently; formulating opinions in our minds that we can't wait to share.  We're not totally listening; we're just waiting to reply.  Even worse, in some cases, we're not even permitting the speaker to finish their thought.  We interrupt with our often not-so-well-thought-out opinio...

What Every Leader Needs to Do to Restore Trust Once It's Broken

    Trust seems to have gone missing these days in almost every aspect of society. The value of it in relationships has been taken for granted, and many people have a wait-and-see attitude about trusting others. There are those who say, "I'll trust you until you give me a reason not to", and there are others who say, "I'll trust you when you prove you're trustworthy." It takes a very long time to get people to a level of comfort where they can let their guard down and be less judgmental about a person's integrity. However, once trust is broken--and it can result from a single egregious act--it may never be restored. Even if it is, it's not likely to make it to full restoration. There's likely to be the barrier of a small amount of lingering doubt along with the memory of the pain felt from the betrayal.  So what needs to happen to weld together a new relationship. The old one has been damaged so something new must happen. Thre...