Skip to main content

Why Monopolizing a Conversation is a Show of Arrogance

     You've likely been in a conversation or at least overheard a conversation where one person talked and talked and talked or continuously interjected their opinion at every breath taken by the other side.  You've probably been in a training class and heard one particular participant constantly have something to say every time the facilitator asked a question or tried to move on with a point in the training.  You found it annoying and no doubt so did the other people around you.  Yet, the individual seems clueless that they are monopolizing the discussion.  Everybody in the room wants to say, "Just shut up already!"
     Facilitators like myself have to work harder in these instances to maintain control of the room.  We know that the other participants are looking to us to keep order so that they can get something out of the precious time they're spending in a training class--sometimes classes they've paid for themselves.  Out of politeness, most people--whether a trainer or just the person who's on the other side of the conversation with a monopolizer--feel like they have to use tricks to quiet the person or to overcome their assertiveness.  This takes a lot of mental energy while still trying to concentrate on what we're teaching.  Therefore, it becomes frustrating.  But rather than have us go through psychological manipulation to protect the monopolizer's feelings, the monopolizer needs to understand this one thing:  your domination of any verbal exchange is a display of arrogance.  Yes, arrogance.  That might seem harsh, but here's what I mean.
     A person who constantly offers their opinion unsolicited is acting as if they have all the answers.  They are the proverbial "know-it-all".  If this could be you, listen up.  Any time you feel you should assert your views when no one has asked you, then you are acting like everyone else wants to hear what you have to say.  You believe that your views are important above everyone else's.  In fact, you show it when you hardly give anyone else a chance to speak.  And even if they do get a word in edgewise, you may counter what they say just so your opinion is heard even louder (not necessarily in volume but in value).  You have to prove your point or share your experience or highlight your perspective.  If you're in a training class where the facilitator may throw a question out to the audience, you are usually the one who has to say something even if other people have already contributed.  Even the content of your contributions are all about you and your beliefs. They are usually self-serving and self-centered.
     Arrogance in this instance says "Look at me.  I have an opinion on that and that and that, and I'm going to tell you about it.  I'm going to tell you about me.  I'm going to tell you about what I believe.  I'm going to tell about how your statement applies to me.  I'm going to tell you about my experience with what you just shared.  I'm going to tell you, I'm going to tell, I'm going to tell."
     So here's some advice:  (Yes it's unsolicited, but it's not about me, it's about you.)  Try humility.  Stop for a minute and consider that you don't have all the answers. And even if you believe you do, no one else cares.  When they ask you directly for your opinion, then offer it.  If it is in an open forum, then refrain from offering too much.  Consider the other people in the room and that they have something to contribute as well.  Give them an opportunity to share.  You may be surprised to find that other people are wise and intelligent too, and you may actually learn something if you just take the focus off of you and listen for a change.  Pass it along.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What It Means to Speak Truth to Power

     "Speaking truth to power" has become a common phrase to use when speaking about truth and/or power in a discussion that encourages courageous discourse on controversial matters.  It is an old phrase coined back in the 1950s by the Quakers and is defined as "a non-violent political tactic, employed by dissidents against the received wisdom or propaganda of governments they regard as oppressive, authoritarian or an ideocracy." (Wikipedia)      I've heard it overused in a lot of ways and not with a clear purpose in its meaning within the context of what was being spoken.  We latch onto certain words and phrases as language goes in and out of style on almost a monthly basis.  In this current generation, there seems to be a new word or phrase created daily and then abandoned when they become overused like worn out sneakers from last year's fall collection.  But words have staying power even if you get tired of hearing the...

A Dozen Ways to Tell Your Boss No

     In basically every training class I do on communications, I get people who are reluctant to manage up.  In a few cases, the direct, decisive communicators establish early on in the relationship their boundaries and preferences to their boss.  Those bosses who can respect other people's limits tend to listen without feeling threatened or disrespected.  But generally, workers tend to treat their superiors as demigods and themselves as powerless servants who shouldn't speak up for fear that they'd be punished for having an opinion or for pushing back in areas where they are overwhelmed or uncomfortable.  I get asked, "What do I do when my manager piles all of this work on me, and I can't get it done by his unreasonable deadlines?"  Among other things like how they manage their time, I usually ask if they've had a discussion with their manager about their workload.  The common response:  "Oh noooo, I can't do that.  He's the b...

How to Stop Interruptions in Conversations

     So you're sitting in a meeting, and you begin to answer a question that has been directed toward you by your boss.  You get through about half of your response when a colleague jumps in and offers his take and essentially silences you.  There is evidence that if you are a woman, this will happen to you more often than if you are a man, and it's likely to happen to you by both genders.      Interruptions in communications like this happen all the time whether you're in a group offering your opinion or one-on-one sharing a story.  Regardless of the setting, we all find it annoying and rude.  These disruptions of dialogue hamper thought processes, contribute to misunderstandings, and devalue people's input.  So what do we do when they keep happening to us?  A few worthy suggestions can be found in Kathryn Vasel's article,  "Next time someone interrupts you in a meeting, try this" .      But what...