Skip to main content

Leadership Lesson for Cam Newton: Communicating Under Stress


    So Cam Newton had a bad day Sunday.  It happens.  But his bad day has turned into a bad week because of his actions at a press conference following his loss in Super Bowl 50.  It's been controversial, to say the least, since there are people who empathize with the MVP's behavior after a tough and painful defeat and others who think he behaved badly after walking off in the middle of a press conference.  Regardless of what side you're on, there are lessons to be learned in communicating when under duress.  Cam can learn them and so can the rest of us.  If I had to coach him in how to handle those difficult moments, I'd recommend the following:
     1)  Slow down.  Take a deep breath and then express your emotions honestly.  No doubt about it, Cam came into the Super Bowl feeling confident he and the Panthers would go home with the trophy.  He was absolutely right in thinking that way.  After all, how can you go into a high stakes game like the Super Bowl anticipating you might lose?  I admire his confidence.  But the tough part of being center stage in such a high-profile contest is if that loss does come, you're still required to talk about it to the entire world when you've hardly had time to process the loss.
     I think it's unfair to expect a competitor like Cam to take such a devastating situation and conduct business as usual.  This was not the usual game.  Too much was riding on it--pride, history, hard work, success, everybody else's expectations, everything!  Win or lose, at the end of a game this intense is raw emotion.  He'd hardly had time to review what went wrong in his mind before he was being bombarded with questions about what went wrong on the field.  He'd had barely a moment to reconcile his feelings when he was thrust into the spotlight and had to face his longtime detractors as I'm sure many gloated.  So I would advise anyone in a leadership position who has to stand before a crowd and face down your mistakes, your failures, and your pain that you breathe first and take your time before speaking and reacting to questions or expectant stares.  Then verbalize your despair.  His response could've sounded something like this:
     I know you have a lot of questions about what happened out there.  I do too.  I haven't had much time to think it through yet because all I know at this moment is that the agony of defeat is real.  I'm extremely disappointed in this loss.  I feel a heavy weight on my shoulders, and it's not going anywhere anytime soon.
     Moments like these require transparency and sincerity.  People can appreciate it.  We've all been there at some point, and this kind of honesty can help people better relate to what he's going through.
     2)  Address the challenges, issues, and failures directly.  Even though he didn't have time to dig deep into the many gaps and shortcomings of his or his teammates, he should have had a sense of what went wrong.  It was obvious to the rest of us who were watching, and yes, even to the press that were firing off questions.  They knew the answers.  They just needed to hear them from him.  He was the man of the hour, and he held his own perspective that everyone was anxious to hear.  Owning whatever fault existed at the time can shut down the haters.  His narrative could've gone a little something like this:
     Until we've had a chance to debrief everything, I can't pinpoint any one thing in particular, but I know that I had a hard time delivering under that Broncos defense.  They did an excellent job of shutting me down and preventing me from being my best.  And isn't that what they were supposed to do?
     Complimenting the competitor when they deserved it shows humility and good sportsmanship.  It might taste like vinegar in his mouth to say it, but it would've done wonders for increasing his equity as a leader.  In corporate organizations when a product or service falters (i.e. a restaurant that sickens its patrons due to bacteria in the food), the head of that organization has to grit his or her teeth and admit fault.  They've got to go before the public and say they messed up somehow, and they're going to make it right.  People develop faith and admiration in leaders who acknowledge their shortfalls without excuse or defensiveness.
     3) And finally, I would advise Cam to finish it all on a high note.  After acknowledging what went wrong, he should then focus on what went right.  And yes, there were things he and the Panthers did right.  The Panthers' defense was stellar.  There were individual performances (Luuuukkeee!) that should be recognized.  Cam could've left his fans looking forward to next year by assuring them that once the team gets back to the drawing board, they'll have a winning plan ready next season.  Fans believe it already, and they certainly are proud of Cam and the Panthers.  I know I am.  So his final comments could've gone like this:
     Though we have some work to do to finish the job next time, I have no doubt we'll be back better than ever.  This was quite a learning experience for all of us.  We're winners.  Losing is tough to accept when you haven't had to face it much in a season.  But we have a first-rate team with the best fans in the world pulling for us, and we can't wait to get back out there to do it all again.  But the next time, we're bringing home the trophy!
     It's all good, Cam.  We're looking forward to your press conference next year.  For those of us living in Panther Nation, we've got a strong feeling that the press conference after SB51 will find you with that winning smile back on your face.
     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What It Means to Speak Truth to Power

     "Speaking truth to power" has become a common phrase to use when speaking about truth and/or power in a discussion that encourages courageous discourse on controversial matters.  It is an old phrase coined back in the 1950s by the Quakers and is defined as "a non-violent political tactic, employed by dissidents against the received wisdom or propaganda of governments they regard as oppressive, authoritarian or an ideocracy." (Wikipedia)      I've heard it overused in a lot of ways and not with a clear purpose in its meaning within the context of what was being spoken.  We latch onto certain words and phrases as language goes in and out of style on almost a monthly basis.  In this current generation, there seems to be a new word or phrase created daily and then abandoned when they become overused like worn out sneakers from last year's fall collection.  But words have staying power even if you get tired of hearing the...

A Dozen Ways to Tell Your Boss No

     In basically every training class I do on communications, I get people who are reluctant to manage up.  In a few cases, the direct, decisive communicators establish early on in the relationship their boundaries and preferences to their boss.  Those bosses who can respect other people's limits tend to listen without feeling threatened or disrespected.  But generally, workers tend to treat their superiors as demigods and themselves as powerless servants who shouldn't speak up for fear that they'd be punished for having an opinion or for pushing back in areas where they are overwhelmed or uncomfortable.  I get asked, "What do I do when my manager piles all of this work on me, and I can't get it done by his unreasonable deadlines?"  Among other things like how they manage their time, I usually ask if they've had a discussion with their manager about their workload.  The common response:  "Oh noooo, I can't do that.  He's the b...

How to Stop Interruptions in Conversations

     So you're sitting in a meeting, and you begin to answer a question that has been directed toward you by your boss.  You get through about half of your response when a colleague jumps in and offers his take and essentially silences you.  There is evidence that if you are a woman, this will happen to you more often than if you are a man, and it's likely to happen to you by both genders.      Interruptions in communications like this happen all the time whether you're in a group offering your opinion or one-on-one sharing a story.  Regardless of the setting, we all find it annoying and rude.  These disruptions of dialogue hamper thought processes, contribute to misunderstandings, and devalue people's input.  So what do we do when they keep happening to us?  A few worthy suggestions can be found in Kathryn Vasel's article,  "Next time someone interrupts you in a meeting, try this" .      But what...